EnjoyHQ was one of the original research repositories, and a lot of teams built their research practice on it. UserTesting acquired it in late 2021 and has since folded it into the wider UserTesting platform, so it's no longer sold as a standalone repository — the choice for a former EnjoyHQ team is between staying inside UserTesting's enterprise contract and moving to a standalone tool. This guide compares the nine realistic options: the direct repository replacements, the analysis-led tools, and the one alternative whose output is a roadmap rather than another archive. An EnjoyHQ alternative here means a tool that stores, searches, and transcribes research the way EnjoyHQ did, sold in a way a former standalone customer can actually buy.
For a like-for-like standalone repository, Dovetail is the most capable and Condens is the value pick; Marvin is the choice if you want AI doing more of the tagging. If your organization is already a UserTesting customer, staying put is the least disruptive option. If the real problem was that research got filed in EnjoyHQ and never changed what was built, Intervool is the alternative built the other way round — the same capture and synthesis, ending in personas, segments, and a prioritized roadmap, on a flat plan with six seats.
Jump to a tool
Compared at a glance
EnjoyHQ did the first three columns well. Any replacement has to match them; the interesting differences are in the last three.
Yes Does thisPartial Partly, or with workaroundsNo Not a feature
What each column means
Store & tag
A structured place to keep findings with a tagging model that stays consistent across studies.
Search across studies
Find a quote or finding from any past study, not just the one you're currently in.
Transcription included
Interview transcription is part of the product rather than something you bring from elsewhere.
AI cross-study themes
AI proposes what repeats across studies instead of you tagging your way to the pattern by hand.
Personas & segments
Builds and maintains profiles of customer types and groups from what the research says, as a first-class workflow.
Prioritized roadmap
Turns what you learned into ranked feature bets inside the same tool, rather than exporting to a separate PM tool.
The categories, and what each is for
These products get compared as if they’re interchangeable. They aren’t — they’re solving different halves of the job.
Repository that ends in decisions
Same capture and synthesis, but findings continue into personas, segments, and a prioritized roadmap.
Intervool
Standalone repositories
The direct replacements: storage, tagging, search, transcription, sold on their own.
Dovetail, Condens, Marvin
Analysis-led tools
Organized around analyzing — canvases, recommendations, AI notes — with a lighter archive.
Notably, Aurelius, Looppanel
Platforms
The repository as part of a larger research platform, including where EnjoyHQ went.
UserTesting, Great Question
The tools in detail
01
Intervool
Our productRepository that ends in decisions
For EnjoyHQ teams whose research never made it out of the repository
app.intervool.com/interviews
Every interview in one searchable library.
Intervool covers what most teams used EnjoyHQ for — a searchable home for interviews, transcripts, and source-linked insights — and then continues where a repository stops. AI clusters what repeats into evidence-linked themes without a tagging taxonomy to maintain, those themes build dynamic personas and segments, and they become an impact-vs-effort roadmap where every bet is one click from the customer quote behind it. It accepts uploaded recordings, audio, and notes, so an EnjoyHQ export can be re-analyzed rather than re-tagged. Pricing is flat and published — Basic $39/mo, Team $279/mo with six seats — which is a different world from an enterprise UserTesting contract. It's less configurable than Dovetail for a large research org with a formal taxonomy.
Best for
Product teams who want the replacement to produce decisions, not a second archive
Pricing
Basic $39/mo · Team $279/mo (6 seats) · Enterprise custom
Free option
14-day free trial, no credit card
Strengths
Findings continue into personas, segments, and a prioritized roadmap
AI proposes themes — no taxonomy to rebuild after migrating
Flat, published pricing; six seats on Team
Accepts uploads, so an EnjoyHQ export isn't stranded
Every insight one click from the quote and person behind it
Limitations
Less configurable than Dovetail for a large research function
Not built around a formal tagging model
No permanent free tier
app.intervool.com/insights
Each insight keeps the interview and person it came from.
app.intervool.com/roadmap
Themes become prioritized bets — each one click from the quote behind it.
The most capable standalone repository — EnjoyHQ's closest peer
dovetail.com
Dovetail is the most mature research repository available: rigorous tagging, excellent search across years of studies, strong integrations, and the governance a large organization needs. Its power depends on discipline — the tagging model is only as good as the person maintaining it — and its per-seat pricing means the people who most need to read the research are often the ones without a login.
Best for
Research teams who want the deepest tagging, search, and governance
Most of the repository job at a fraction of the price
condens.io
Condens covers the core repository job — storing, tagging, highlighting, searching — with a clean interface and pricing starting around €15 per user per month. For a team of two or three researchers it delivers most of what Dovetail does at a fraction of the cost. It's lighter on enterprise governance and very large archives, and like every repository it ends at synthesis: nothing in it turns a theme into a prioritized decision.
Best for
Small research teams leaving an enterprise contract for something they can expense
Marvin (heymarvin.com) is a research repository with AI synthesis as a first-class feature rather than an add-on: it transcribes, summarizes, and proposes clusters, which cuts the manual tagging a study needs. For teams who find repository upkeep the tedious part that's a genuine advantage. Paid tiers are quoted rather than published, and the analysis is still the end of the line — outputs hand off to a separate roadmap tool.
Best for
Teams who don't want to rebuild an EnjoyHQ-style taxonomy by hand
Pricing
Paid tiers quoted on request (Starter, Pro, Enterprise)
Free option
Free plan — 5 file uploads/mo, AI notetaker and Ask AI included
Recruiting, research CRM, and a repository in one platform
Great Question is an all-in-one research platform: participant recruiting and a research CRM, scheduling and incentives, interviews and surveys, and a repository for what comes out. If the pain of leaving your current repository is that it never handled recruiting, Great Question closes that gap in one tool. The repository is the less developed half — tagging and synthesis are lighter than in Dovetail or Condens — and pricing is quoted rather than published.
Best for
Research ops teams who also need participant recruiting
Pricing
Plans quoted on request (Starter, Team, Enterprise)
Free option
Free trial
Strengths
Recruiting, CRM, incentives, and repository in one place
Strong for teams running research ops at scale
Good survey and interview scheduling workflows
Limitations
Repository and synthesis lighter than dedicated tools
Notably pairs a repository with a visual canvas for affinity mapping and AI assistance for summarizing and clustering. If your analysis process involves arranging notes into groups and moving them around until the shape emerges, it matches that thinking more directly than a tag-and-filter repository does. It's a smaller product with a smaller ecosystem than the established players.
Best for
Researchers who analyze by grouping things visually
Aurelius structures research around the chain from raw notes to key findings to recommendations, which forces analysis to end in a statement someone can act on rather than a pile of tagged quotes. That structure is its main idea and it's a good one. It's a smaller, simpler product than Dovetail — fewer integrations, less governance, lighter AI — and recommendations still hand off to a PM tool to become a plan.
Best for
Teams who want each study to end in a recommendation
Looppanel joins research calls, transcribes them, generates notes against your discussion guide, and lets you ask questions across a whole study. Its storage layer exists but the product's centre is analysis, which makes it a good fit if the repository was never really the point. For an organization that needs a durable, governed archive across years of research, a dedicated repository is the better shape.
Best for
A researcher who cares more about analysis speed than the filing system
Pricing
Pro from ~$395/mo (5 editors); ~$75/mo per additional editor
Where EnjoyHQ went — the repository inside the UserTesting platform
usertesting.com
UserTesting is the enterprise human-insight platform: a very large managed panel, moderated and unmoderated testing, and — since it acquired EnjoyHQ in 2021 — a repository layer inside the same platform. For a large organization that wants recruiting, testing, and storage under one contract it's the safest choice. It's quote-based, annual, and priced for enterprises; a small team leaving a repository for cost reasons won't find relief here.
Best for
Existing UserTesting customers who want the least disruptive path
Pricing
Custom / enterprise quote
Free option
Free trial by request
Strengths
Largest managed panel in the category
Testing and repository under one enterprise contract
Forrester found that 60–73% of enterprise data goes unused, and Pendo's feature-adoption research found 80% of product features are rarely or never used. A EnjoyHQ alternative that only stores research better doesn't touch either number; one that carries findings into what gets built does. That's why the last two grid columns are weighted as heavily as the first three.
We separated 'stay' from 'move'
For a former EnjoyHQ team the first question isn't which repository — it's whether to remain inside UserTesting. That option is listed on its own terms, with the honest note that it only makes sense if you're already an enterprise UserTesting customer.
We held every tool to EnjoyHQ's baseline
Storage, search, and transcription are what EnjoyHQ did well. The first three grid columns check that a replacement doesn't lose them.
We weighted the migration cost
Tags don't survive a repository migration. Tools that re-derive structure from raw recordings and notes carry a lower migration cost than tag-first repositories, and we noted which is which.
Pricing checked August 2026, and we're not neutral
Published prices as of August 2026, rounded; enterprise tiers are negotiable. Intervool is ours and marked as such; its weakness against Dovetail — less configurable tagging for a large research function — is stated in its own entry.
FAQ
Common questions
What happened to EnjoyHQ?
UserTesting acquired EnjoyHQ in late 2021 and has since integrated it into the UserTesting platform as its repository layer. It is no longer sold as a standalone research repository, so teams that used EnjoyHQ on its own are choosing between UserTesting's enterprise platform and a standalone alternative.
What is the best alternative to EnjoyHQ?
Dovetail for the most capable standalone repository, Condens for the same job at a lower price, Marvin for AI-assisted tagging, and Intervool if you want the replacement to carry research into personas and a prioritized roadmap rather than stopping at an archive. Existing UserTesting customers can simply stay.
Is EnjoyHQ still available inside UserTesting?
Yes — the repository capability lives on inside the UserTesting platform, sold as part of an enterprise, quote-based contract. If your organization already has UserTesting, that's the least disruptive option. If you bought EnjoyHQ on its own as a small team, the UserTesting contract is usually a step up in cost and scope.
EnjoyHQ vs Dovetail — which is better now?
Dovetail, for any team that wants a standalone repository: it has the deeper tagging model, search, and integrations, publishes its pricing, and is actively developed as its own product. EnjoyHQ's advantage is only relevant if you're already inside UserTesting and want testing and repository under one contract.
Can I migrate from EnjoyHQ to another tool?
Recordings, transcripts, and notes export; tags and the EnjoyHQ taxonomy generally don't map to another repository. Tools that re-derive structure from the raw files on upload — Intervool does this, and Marvin's AI clustering reduces the rebuild — avoid re-tagging an entire archive by hand.
What is the cheapest EnjoyHQ alternative?
Condens, from around €15 per user per month, is the cheapest full repository. For a team where more than a handful of people need to read the research, a flat plan usually costs less overall — Intervool's Team plan is $279/mo with six seats included. Notion is free but has no transcription or source-linked quotes.
